Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Graham v. District Court, 06-7527 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 06-7527 Visitors: 29
Filed: Jan. 23, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7527 PAUL GRAHAM, Petitioner - Appellant, versus DISTRICT COURT, for Baltimore County, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (1:06-cv-02038-CCB) Submitted: January 18, 2007 Decided: January 23, 2007 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paul Graham,
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7527 PAUL GRAHAM, Petitioner - Appellant, versus DISTRICT COURT, for Baltimore County, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (1:06-cv-02038-CCB) Submitted: January 18, 2007 Decided: January 23, 2007 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paul Graham, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Paul Graham appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint. The district court stated that the document was a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) complaint, but because Graham is not challenging a conviction or sentence, the claim is more properly construed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). Nonetheless, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Graham v. District Court, No. 1:06-cv-02038-CCB (D. Md. Aug. 22, 2006). We deny Graham’s motions for appointment of counsel and oral argument. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer