Filed: Jan. 22, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7770 DON JUAN TORRES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus R. O’QUINN; D. TATE; D. MUNCY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:06-cv-00576-GEC) Submitted: December 18, 2006 Decided: January 22, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Don Juan Torres, App
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7770 DON JUAN TORRES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus R. O’QUINN; D. TATE; D. MUNCY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:06-cv-00576-GEC) Submitted: December 18, 2006 Decided: January 22, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Don Juan Torres, Appe..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7770 DON JUAN TORRES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus R. O’QUINN; D. TATE; D. MUNCY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:06-cv-00576-GEC) Submitted: December 18, 2006 Decided: January 22, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Don Juan Torres, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Don Juan Torres appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Torres v. O’Quinn, No. 7:06-cv-00576-GEC (W.D. Va. Sept. 29, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
