Filed: Jan. 24, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7842 RANDALL SALTERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KEN BUTLER; ERICA M. GREENBERG; BILLY SANDERS; NORTH CAROLINA PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:06-ct-3073-H) Submitted: January 18, 2007 Decided: January 24, 2007 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGO
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7842 RANDALL SALTERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KEN BUTLER; ERICA M. GREENBERG; BILLY SANDERS; NORTH CAROLINA PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:06-ct-3073-H) Submitted: January 18, 2007 Decided: January 24, 2007 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGOR..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7842 RANDALL SALTERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KEN BUTLER; ERICA M. GREENBERG; BILLY SANDERS; NORTH CAROLINA PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:06-ct-3073-H) Submitted: January 18, 2007 Decided: January 24, 2007 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Randall Salters, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Randall Salters appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Salters v. Butler, No. 5:06-ct-3073-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 19, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED - 2 -
