Filed: Aug. 29, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7866 DWAYNE DION BACON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MR. WRIGHT; MRS. MORTON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:06-cv-01678-AW; 8:06-cv-01679-AW) Submitted: August 8, 2007 Decided: August 29, 2007 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dwayn
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7866 DWAYNE DION BACON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MR. WRIGHT; MRS. MORTON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:06-cv-01678-AW; 8:06-cv-01679-AW) Submitted: August 8, 2007 Decided: August 29, 2007 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dwayne..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7866 DWAYNE DION BACON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MR. WRIGHT; MRS. MORTON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:06-cv-01678-AW; 8:06-cv-01679-AW) Submitted: August 8, 2007 Decided: August 29, 2007 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dwayne Dion Bacon, Appellant Pro Se. Carol Saffran Brinks, HOWARD COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Ellicott City, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Dwayne Dion Bacon appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Bacon v. Wright, Nos. 8:06-cv-01678-AW; 8:06-cv-01679-AW (D. Md. filed Oct. 16, 2006 & entered Oct. 17, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
