Filed: Jul. 19, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1029 DAMIEN DONOVAN WILLIAMS, Petitioner, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U. S. Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A41-359-137) Submitted: July 9, 2007 Decided: July 19, 2007 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Damien Donovan Williams, Petitioner Pro Se. M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, UNITED STATES D
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1029 DAMIEN DONOVAN WILLIAMS, Petitioner, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U. S. Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A41-359-137) Submitted: July 9, 2007 Decided: July 19, 2007 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Damien Donovan Williams, Petitioner Pro Se. M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, UNITED STATES DE..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1029
DAMIEN DONOVAN WILLIAMS,
Petitioner,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U. S. Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A41-359-137)
Submitted: July 9, 2007 Decided: July 19, 2007
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Damien Donovan Williams, Petitioner Pro Se. M. Jocelyn Lopez
Wright, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for
Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Damien Donovan Williams, a native and citizen of Jamaica,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reconsider its previous
order, which vacated the immigration judge’s decision and ordered
his removal to Jamaica. We have reviewed the record and the
Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion
in denying the motion to reconsider. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a)
(2006); Jean v. Gonzales,
435 F.3d 475, 481 (4th Cir. 2006).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated
by the Board. See In Re: Williams, No. A41-359-137 (B.I.A. Dec.
14, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
- 2 -