Filed: Dec. 17, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1765 KURT G. SCHLEGEL, Assignee of Piedmont Building and Development Corporation, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BANK OF AMERICA, NA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (3:07-cv-00022-nkm) Submitted: December 13, 2007 Decided: December 17, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1765 KURT G. SCHLEGEL, Assignee of Piedmont Building and Development Corporation, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BANK OF AMERICA, NA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (3:07-cv-00022-nkm) Submitted: December 13, 2007 Decided: December 17, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1765 KURT G. SCHLEGEL, Assignee of Piedmont Building and Development Corporation, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BANK OF AMERICA, NA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (3:07-cv-00022-nkm) Submitted: December 13, 2007 Decided: December 17, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kurt G. Schlegel, Appellant Pro Se. Megan Conway Rahman, TROUTMAN & SANDERS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Kurt G. Schlegel appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil conspiracy complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Schlegel v. Bank of America, NA, No. 3:07-cv- 00022-nkm (W.D. Va. June 12 & July 23, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
