Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Chapman v. Huffman, 07-6053 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 07-6053 Visitors: 58
Filed: Jun. 28, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6053 LOUIS RAY CHAPMAN, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LARRY HUFFMAN, Regional Director, Western Regional Office; DANIEL A. BRAXTON, Warden, Augusta Correctional Center; CAPTAIN SMILEY, Shift Commander; SERGEANT PRITT, Building Sergeant (Supervisor); C/O TYLER; C/O WHITT; C/O BURCH; DONALD A. VORGERT, Food Service Director-A; TOM SANDERS, Food Service Director-B, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States Dis
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6053 LOUIS RAY CHAPMAN, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LARRY HUFFMAN, Regional Director, Western Regional Office; DANIEL A. BRAXTON, Warden, Augusta Correctional Center; CAPTAIN SMILEY, Shift Commander; SERGEANT PRITT, Building Sergeant (Supervisor); C/O TYLER; C/O WHITT; C/O BURCH; DONALD A. VORGERT, Food Service Director-A; TOM SANDERS, Food Service Director-B, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:06-cv-00708-jlk) Submitted: May 30, 2007 Decided: June 28, 2007 Before MICHAEL, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Louis Ray Chapman, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Louis Ray Chapman, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Chapman v. Huffman, No. 7:06-cv-00708-jlk (W.D. Va. Dec. 14, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer