Filed: Sep. 04, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6094 LLOYD EUGENE BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOSE A. SERANNO; REX BLOCKER; RICHARD FRICKEY; LOUSIA ROSARIO; GARY FAVOUR, Nurse; UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (2:05-cv-03342-RBH) Submitted: June 2
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6094 LLOYD EUGENE BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOSE A. SERANNO; REX BLOCKER; RICHARD FRICKEY; LOUSIA ROSARIO; GARY FAVOUR, Nurse; UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (2:05-cv-03342-RBH) Submitted: June 29..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6094
LLOYD EUGENE BROWN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOSE A. SERANNO; REX BLOCKER; RICHARD FRICKEY;
LOUSIA ROSARIO; GARY FAVOUR, Nurse; UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH
CAROLINA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED
STATES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(2:05-cv-03342-RBH)
Submitted: June 29, 2007 Decided: September 4, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lloyd Eugene Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lloyd Eugene Brown appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six
Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388
(1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Brown v. Seranno, No. 2:05-cv-03342-RBH (D.S.C. filed
Nov. 30, 2006 & entered Dec. 1, 2006). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -