Filed: Jun. 22, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6409 DONTA VAUGHN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus VANESSA P. ADAMS, Warden; FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX, PETERSBURG, VIRGINIA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:07-cv-00167-TSE) Submitted: June 15, 2007 Decided: June 22, 2007 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpubl
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6409 DONTA VAUGHN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus VANESSA P. ADAMS, Warden; FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX, PETERSBURG, VIRGINIA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:07-cv-00167-TSE) Submitted: June 15, 2007 Decided: June 22, 2007 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpubli..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6409
DONTA VAUGHN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
VANESSA P. ADAMS, Warden; FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL
COMPLEX, PETERSBURG, VIRGINIA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior
District Judge. (1:07-cv-00167-TSE)
Submitted: June 15, 2007 Decided: June 22, 2007
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donta Vaughn, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Donta Vaughn appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion for a temporary restraining order, which the district
court construed as a complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six
Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388
(1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Vaughn v. Adams, No. 1:07-cv-00167-TSE (E.D. Va. Mar. 6,
2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -