Filed: Jun. 29, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6607 DEXTER MCPHAIL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RHONDA RAYNOR; NORMAN WAYNE NAYLOR, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, District Judge. (5:07-ct-03024-D) Submitted: June 21, 2007 Decided: June 29, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dexter McPhail
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6607 DEXTER MCPHAIL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RHONDA RAYNOR; NORMAN WAYNE NAYLOR, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, District Judge. (5:07-ct-03024-D) Submitted: June 21, 2007 Decided: June 29, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dexter McPhail,..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6607 DEXTER MCPHAIL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RHONDA RAYNOR; NORMAN WAYNE NAYLOR, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, District Judge. (5:07-ct-03024-D) Submitted: June 21, 2007 Decided: June 29, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dexter McPhail, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Dexter McPhail appeals the district court’s order dismissing his action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McPhail v. Raynor, No. 5:07-ct-03024-D (E.D.N.C. Mar. 27, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
