Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

McBee v. Stansberry, 07-7274 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 07-7274 Visitors: 15
Filed: Nov. 27, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7274 RUSSELL LEE MCBEE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, District Judge. (5:07-hc-02075-D) Submitted: November 15, 2007 Decided: November 27, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ru
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7274 RUSSELL LEE MCBEE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, District Judge. (5:07-hc-02075-D) Submitted: November 15, 2007 Decided: November 27, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Russell Lee McBee, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Russell Lee McBee, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s judgment denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McBee v. Stansberry, No. 5:07-hc-02075-D (E.D.N.C. July 5, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer