Filed: Apr. 28, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1654 ILESANMI MOHAMMED OSENI, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A76-127-134) Submitted: March 19, 2008 Decided: April 28, 2008 Before TRAXLER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Fatai A. Suleman, AMITY, KUM & SULEMAN, P.A., Greenbelt, Maryland, f
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1654 ILESANMI MOHAMMED OSENI, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A76-127-134) Submitted: March 19, 2008 Decided: April 28, 2008 Before TRAXLER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Fatai A. Suleman, AMITY, KUM & SULEMAN, P.A., Greenbelt, Maryland, fo..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1654
ILESANMI MOHAMMED OSENI,
Petitioner,
v.
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A76-127-134)
Submitted: March 19, 2008 Decided: April 28, 2008
Before TRAXLER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Fatai A. Suleman, AMITY, KUM & SULEMAN, P.A., Greenbelt, Maryland,
for Petitioner. Jeffrey S. Bucholtz, Acting Assistant Attorney
General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Song E. Park,
Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ilesanmi Mohammed Oseni, a native and citizen of Nigeria,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings.
We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s order
and conclude the Board did not abuse its discretion. 8 C.F.R.
§ 1003.2(a) (2007); INS v. Doherty,
502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992);
Nibagwire v. Gonzales,
450 F.3d 153, 156 (4th Cir. 2006).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated
by the Board. In Re: Oseni, No. A76-127-134 (B.I.A. June 18,
2007). We also deny Oseni’s motion for stay of removal as moot.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
- 2 -