Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Copley v. Graham, 07-1789 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 07-1789 Visitors: 29
Filed: Mar. 03, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1789 In Re: JOHN T. COPLEY, Debtor. - - - - - - - - - - - - JOHN T. COPLEY, Debtor - Appellant, v. H. LYNDEN GRAHAM, JR.; US TRUSTEE, Trustees - Appellees, Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (3:06-cv-00240; BK-97-30131) Submitted: February 28, 2008 Decided: March 3, 2008 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit J
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1789 In Re: JOHN T. COPLEY, Debtor. - - - - - - - - - - - - JOHN T. COPLEY, Debtor - Appellant, v. H. LYNDEN GRAHAM, JR.; US TRUSTEE, Trustees - Appellees, Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (3:06-cv-00240; BK-97-30131) Submitted: February 28, 2008 Decided: March 3, 2008 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John T. Copley, Appellant Pro Se. Lynn B. Pollard, HAMILTON, BURGESS, YOUNG & POLLARD, PLLC, Fayetteville, West Virginia; Douglas A. Kilmer, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: John T. Copley appeals from the district court’s orders affirming the bankruptcy court’s order and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and decisions of the bankruptcy court and the district court and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Copley v. Graham, Nos. 3:06-cv-00240; BK-97- 30131 (S.D.W. Va. July 10 & 20, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer