Filed: May 06, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1883 LISA MILLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SYBASE, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (8:06-cv-01176-DKC) Submitted: April 15, 2008 Decided: May 6, 2008 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeanett P. Henry, HENRY & MADDOX, LLC, Silver Spr
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1883 LISA MILLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SYBASE, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (8:06-cv-01176-DKC) Submitted: April 15, 2008 Decided: May 6, 2008 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeanett P. Henry, HENRY & MADDOX, LLC, Silver Spri..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1883 LISA MILLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SYBASE, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (8:06-cv-01176-DKC) Submitted: April 15, 2008 Decided: May 6, 2008 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeanett P. Henry, HENRY & MADDOX, LLC, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Appellant. Tyler A. Brown, JACKSON LEWIS LLP, Vienna, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Lisa Miller appeals the district court’s order granting Sybase, Incorporated’s summary judgment motion on her race discrimination and retaliation claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000) and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. See Miller v. Sybase, Inc., No. 8:06-cv-01176-DKC (D. Md. Aug. 8, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -