Filed: Feb. 27, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1895 LARRY C. WEST, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LEAH BUSH, M.D., Deputy Chief Medical Examiner, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:07-cv-00135-RAJ) Submitted: February 12, 2008 Decided: February 27, 2008 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry C
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1895 LARRY C. WEST, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LEAH BUSH, M.D., Deputy Chief Medical Examiner, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:07-cv-00135-RAJ) Submitted: February 12, 2008 Decided: February 27, 2008 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry C...
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1895
LARRY C. WEST,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LEAH BUSH, M.D., Deputy Chief Medical Examiner,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:07-cv-00135-RAJ)
Submitted: February 12, 2008 Decided: February 27, 2008
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry C. West, Appellant Pro Se. Howard Martin Casway, Assistant
Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Larry C. West seeks to appeal the district court’s order
dismissing his civil action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of
jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.
Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the
district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.
App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal
period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period
under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory
and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr.,
434 U.S.
257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson,
361 U.S. 220,
229 (1960)).
The district court’s order was entered on the docket on
July 9, 2007. The notice of appeal was filed on September 5, 2007.
On December 21, 2007, West filed a motion in this court to obtain
an extension or reopening of the appeal period. We deny the motion
to extend or reopen the appeal period and dismiss the appeal. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 2 -