Filed: Aug. 06, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-2048 CONNIE JOHNSON; RAY JOHNSON, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. DIAL INDUSTRIES SALES, INCORPORATED; TELESTEPS, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (3:05-cv-00047-JPB) Submitted: July 14, 2008 Decided: August 6, 2008 Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-2048 CONNIE JOHNSON; RAY JOHNSON, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. DIAL INDUSTRIES SALES, INCORPORATED; TELESTEPS, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (3:05-cv-00047-JPB) Submitted: July 14, 2008 Decided: August 6, 2008 Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-2048 CONNIE JOHNSON; RAY JOHNSON, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. DIAL INDUSTRIES SALES, INCORPORATED; TELESTEPS, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (3:05-cv-00047-JPB) Submitted: July 14, 2008 Decided: August 6, 2008 Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dennis F. O’Brien, FOARD, GISRIEL, O’BRIEN & WARD, LLC, Towson, Maryland, for Appellants. John T. Sly, James B. Lees, Jr., WARANCH & BROWN, LLC, Lutherville, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Connie and Ray Johnson appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Dial Indus. Sales, Inc., No. 3:05-cv-00047-JPB (N.D. W. Va. Sept. 21, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
