Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Mosley, 07-6717 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 07-6717 Visitors: 12
Filed: Apr. 01, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6717 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JOSEPH IZELL MOSLEY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (7:02-cr-00376-GRA) Submitted: March 27, 2008 Decided: April 1, 2008 Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6717 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JOSEPH IZELL MOSLEY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (7:02-cr-00376-GRA) Submitted: March 27, 2008 Decided: April 1, 2008 Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph Izell Mosley, Appellant Pro Se. Alan Lance Crick, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Joseph Izell Mosley, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Mosley, No. 7:02-cr-00376-GRA (D.S.C. Apr. 26, 2007). Further, we deny as unnecessary Mosley’s motion for a certificate of appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer