Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Diallo v. Perreira, 07-7030 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 07-7030 Visitors: 21
Filed: Jan. 08, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7030 MAMADOU BAILO DIALLO, Petitioner - Appellant, versus MELANIE PERREIRA, Director of Howard County Detention Center; CALVIN MCCORMICK, District Director of Homeland Security and bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement; DOUGLAS RIPPE, Supervisor of DHS/BICE Field Detention of Baltimore, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander William
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7030 MAMADOU BAILO DIALLO, Petitioner - Appellant, versus MELANIE PERREIRA, Director of Howard County Detention Center; CALVIN MCCORMICK, District Director of Homeland Security and bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement; DOUGLAS RIPPE, Supervisor of DHS/BICE Field Detention of Baltimore, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:07-cv-00348-AW) Submitted: December 19, 2007 Decided: January 8, 2008 Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mamadou Bailo Diallo, Appellant Pro Se. George William Maugans, III, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Mamadou Bailo Diallo appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Diallo v. Perreira, No. 8:07-cv-00348-AW (D. Md. June 29, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer