Filed: Jan. 10, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7089 PETER O. ODIGHIZUWA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus OFFICER S. STROUTH, Defendant - Appellee, and OFFICER J. POWERS; GARY BASS, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, Magistrate Judge. (7:06-cv-00720-mfu) Submitted: December 19, 2007 Decided: January 10, 2008 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7089 PETER O. ODIGHIZUWA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus OFFICER S. STROUTH, Defendant - Appellee, and OFFICER J. POWERS; GARY BASS, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, Magistrate Judge. (7:06-cv-00720-mfu) Submitted: December 19, 2007 Decided: January 10, 2008 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7089 PETER O. ODIGHIZUWA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus OFFICER S. STROUTH, Defendant - Appellee, and OFFICER J. POWERS; GARY BASS, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, Magistrate Judge. (7:06-cv-00720-mfu) Submitted: December 19, 2007 Decided: January 10, 2008 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Peter O. Odighizuwa, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Peter O. Odighizuwa appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Odighizuwa v. Strouth, No. 7:06-cv-00720-mfu (W.D. Va. Apr. 17, 2007 & July 6, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * The case was decided by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000). - 2 -