Filed: Jan. 25, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7372 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DAMOND NELSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:02-cr-00193-GCM) Submitted: January 17, 2008 Decided: January 25, 2008 Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Damond Nelson, A
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7372 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DAMOND NELSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:02-cr-00193-GCM) Submitted: January 17, 2008 Decided: January 25, 2008 Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Damond Nelson, Ap..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7372 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DAMOND NELSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:02-cr-00193-GCM) Submitted: January 17, 2008 Decided: January 25, 2008 Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Damond Nelson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Damond Nelson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for clarification of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Damond, No. 3:02-cr-00193-GCM (W.D.N.C. Aug. 28, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
