Filed: Jan. 25, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7391 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ANGEL LUIS RODRIGUEZ, aka Hector Reyes, aka Angel Ayala, aka Jose M. Gomez, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:03-cr-00092-DCN; 2:07-cv-70004-DCN) Submitted: January 17, 2008 Decided: January 25, 2008 Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Jud
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7391 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ANGEL LUIS RODRIGUEZ, aka Hector Reyes, aka Angel Ayala, aka Jose M. Gomez, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:03-cr-00092-DCN; 2:07-cv-70004-DCN) Submitted: January 17, 2008 Decided: January 25, 2008 Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judg..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-7391
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ANGEL LUIS RODRIGUEZ, aka Hector Reyes, aka
Angel Ayala, aka Jose M. Gomez,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(2:03-cr-00092-DCN; 2:07-cv-70004-DCN)
Submitted: January 17, 2008 Decided: January 25, 2008
Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Angel Luis Rodriguez, Appellant Pro Se. Alston Calhoun Badger,
Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Angel Luis Rodriguez seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying his motion for recusal. This court may exercise
jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and
certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292
(2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan
Corp.,
337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Rodriguez seeks to appeal is
neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral
order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of
jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 2 -