Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Woody v. State of North Carolina, 07-7693 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 07-7693 Visitors: 12
Filed: Apr. 17, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7693 ANDRE LAMAR WOODY, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; MIKE F. EASLEY; LEXIS PUBLISHING; NANCY S. NASH, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (2:07-cv-00032-D) Submitted: March 20, 2008 Decided: April 17, 2008 Before GREG
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7693 ANDRE LAMAR WOODY, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; MIKE F. EASLEY; LEXIS PUBLISHING; NANCY S. NASH, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (2:07-cv-00032-D) Submitted: March 20, 2008 Decided: April 17, 2008 Before GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andre Lamar Woody, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Andre Lamar Woody appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000) and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.* See Woody v. North Carolina, No. 2:07-cv-00032-D) (E.D.N.C Oct. 3 and Nov. 9, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED * We also deny Woody’s request for mandamus relief. 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer