Filed: Oct. 30, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1060 ESKEDAR TESHOME-GEBREEGZIABHER, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: August 29, 2008 Decided: October 30, 2008 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, SHEDD, Circuit Judge, and Claude M. HILTON, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, sitting by designation. Petition denied by unpublish
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1060 ESKEDAR TESHOME-GEBREEGZIABHER, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: August 29, 2008 Decided: October 30, 2008 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, SHEDD, Circuit Judge, and Claude M. HILTON, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, sitting by designation. Petition denied by unpublishe..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1060
ESKEDAR TESHOME-GEBREEGZIABHER,
Petitioner,
v.
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: August 29, 2008 Decided: October 30, 2008
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, SHEDD, Circuit Judge, and Claude M.
HILTON, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Virginia, sitting by designation.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jason A. Dzubow, MENSAH, BUTLER & DZUBOW, PLLC, Washington, D.C.,
for Petitioner. Gregory G. Katsas, Acting Assistant Attorney
General, David V. Bernal, Assistant Director, Stuart S. Nickum,
OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Eskedar Teshome-Gebreegziabher, a native and citizen of
Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of
Immigration Appeals affirming the Immigration Judge’s denial of her
applications for relief from removal. Teshome challenges the
determination that she failed to establish eligibility for asylum.
To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility for
relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was so
compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the
requisite fear of persecution.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias,
502 U.S.
478, 483-84 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and
conclude that Teshome fails to show that the evidence compels a
contrary result.
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
- 2 -