Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Bellamy v. Ford Motor Company, 08-1273 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 08-1273 Visitors: 20
Filed: Aug. 04, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1273 RALEIGH ADOLPH BELLAMY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY; NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:07-cv-00287-FDW-DCK) Submitted: July 31, 2008 Decided: August 4, 2008 Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.* Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1273 RALEIGH ADOLPH BELLAMY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY; NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:07-cv-00287-FDW-DCK) Submitted: July 31, 2008 Decided: August 4, 2008 Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.* Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Raleigh Adolph Bellamy, Appellant Pro Se. Addie K.S. Ries, SMITH, ANDERSON, BLOUNT, DORSETT, MITCHELL & JERNIGAN, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; W. Lewis Smith, Jr., ROBINSON, ELLIOTT & SMITH, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. * The opinion is filed by a quorum pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). PER CURIAM: Raleigh Bellamy appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bellamy v. Ford Motor Company, No. 3:07-cv-00287-FDW-DCK (W.D.N.C. Feb. 6, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer