Filed: Oct. 31, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1537 STANLEY D. LEGUM, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SMITH BARNEY, INCORPORATED, Defendant – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter D. Kelley, Jr., District Judge. (2:06-cv-00542-WDK-TEM) Submitted: September 30, 2008 Decided: October 31, 2008 Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stanley D. Legum,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1537 STANLEY D. LEGUM, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SMITH BARNEY, INCORPORATED, Defendant – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter D. Kelley, Jr., District Judge. (2:06-cv-00542-WDK-TEM) Submitted: September 30, 2008 Decided: October 31, 2008 Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stanley D. Legum, ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1537 STANLEY D. LEGUM, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SMITH BARNEY, INCORPORATED, Defendant – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter D. Kelley, Jr., District Judge. (2:06-cv-00542-WDK-TEM) Submitted: September 30, 2008 Decided: October 31, 2008 Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stanley D. Legum, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Harrold Sorensen, GREENBERG & TRAURIG, LLP, McLean, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Stanley D. Legum appeals the district court’s order confirming an arbitration award against Legum and dismissing this action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Legum v. Smith Barney, Inc., No. 2:06-cv-00542- WDK-TEM (E.D. Va. Apr. 11, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
