Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Yongo v. Nationwide Insurance Company, 08-1668 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 08-1668 Visitors: 28
Filed: Nov. 13, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1668 PAUL YONGO, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY; CAROL MARTIN; RHONDA HOGGE, AIC; NATIONWIDE CLAIMS DEPARTMENT; NATIONWIDE LOSS ADJUSTERS; SHARRON STEPHEN-HENLEY; ARTHUR WALTER; NATIONWIDE AFFINITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY; J. CATER GLASS; HAROLD C. RHUDY, Defendants – Appellees, and LATONYA MICHELE MCNEIL, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Cou
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1668 PAUL YONGO, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY; CAROL MARTIN; RHONDA HOGGE, AIC; NATIONWIDE CLAIMS DEPARTMENT; NATIONWIDE LOSS ADJUSTERS; SHARRON STEPHEN-HENLEY; ARTHUR WALTER; NATIONWIDE AFFINITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY; J. CATER GLASS; HAROLD C. RHUDY, Defendants – Appellees, and LATONYA MICHELE MCNEIL, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:07-cv-00094-D) Submitted: October 8, 2008 Decided: November 13, 2008 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paul Yongo, Appellant Pro Se. George Lee Simpson, III, LAW OFFICE OF GEORGE L. SIMPSON, III, Raleigh, North Carolina; Benjamin E. Thompson, III, BROUGHTON, WILKINS, SMITH, SUGGS & THOMPSON, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Paul Yongo appeals the district court’s orders accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing his civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and denying his post-judgment motion to amend his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Yongo v. Nationwide Ins. Co., No. 5:07-cv-00094-D (E.D.N.C. May 16, 2008; May 27, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer