Filed: Nov. 18, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1701 SIDDI JON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK; BRIAN CHAN; PROFESSIONAL CHOICE, INCORPORATED; CNA; MARCELLA WOODS LLC, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:08-cv-00632-JFM) Submitted: November 13, 2008 Decided: November 18, 2008 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed b
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1701 SIDDI JON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK; BRIAN CHAN; PROFESSIONAL CHOICE, INCORPORATED; CNA; MARCELLA WOODS LLC, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:08-cv-00632-JFM) Submitted: November 13, 2008 Decided: November 18, 2008 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1701 SIDDI JON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK; BRIAN CHAN; PROFESSIONAL CHOICE, INCORPORATED; CNA; MARCELLA WOODS LLC, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:08-cv-00632-JFM) Submitted: November 13, 2008 Decided: November 18, 2008 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Siddi Jon, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Wood Bryant, POPE & HUGHES, PA, Townson, Maryland; Michael Paul Tanczyn, Townson, Maryland; Jeffrey M. Kotz, Townson, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Siddi Jon appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss her civil actions related to the foreclosure action that culminated in the sale of her home. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Jon’s motion for default judgment and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jon v. Washington Mut. Bank, No. 1:08-cv-00632-JFM (D. Md. May 19, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2