In Re: Fontanes v., 08-1943 (2008)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: 08-1943
Visitors: 19
Filed: Nov. 18, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1943 In Re: RONALD FONTANES, Petitioner. On Petition for Extraordinary Writ under the All Writs Act. (1:04-cv-00043-LMB-L0) Submitted: November 13, 2008 Decided: November 18, 2008 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald Fontanes, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ronald Fontanes petitions fo
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1943 In Re: RONALD FONTANES, Petitioner. On Petition for Extraordinary Writ under the All Writs Act. (1:04-cv-00043-LMB-L0) Submitted: November 13, 2008 Decided: November 18, 2008 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald Fontanes, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ronald Fontanes petitions for..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1943 In Re: RONALD FONTANES, Petitioner. On Petition for Extraordinary Writ under the All Writs Act. (1:04-cv-00043-LMB-L0) Submitted: November 13, 2008 Decided: November 18, 2008 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald Fontanes, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ronald Fontanes petitions for an extraordinary writ pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651(a) (2000). We find that relief is not warranted. Accordingly, while we grant Fontanes leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2
Source: CourtListener
