Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Judd v. United States, 08-6009 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 08-6009 Visitors: 14
Filed: Mar. 31, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6009 KEITH RUSSELL JUDD, For President of USA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (3:06-cv-00243-MBS) Submitted: March 25, 2008 Decided: March 31, 2008 Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Keith Russell
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6009 KEITH RUSSELL JUDD, For President of USA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (3:06-cv-00243-MBS) Submitted: March 25, 2008 Decided: March 31, 2008 Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Keith Russell Judd, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Keith Russell Judd appeals the district court’s order denying his motions for relief from the court’s previous order denying relief on his complaint that sought damages for alleged unjust imprisonment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Judd v. United States, No. 3:06-cv-00243-MBS (D.S.C. filed Nov. 14 and entered Nov. 15, 2007). We deny Judd’s motion to transfer his appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and his motion for reconsideration of the order deferring action on his motion to transfer. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer