Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. MacWilliams, 08-6025 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 08-6025 Visitors: 9
Filed: May 28, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6025 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. THOMAS J. MACWILLIAMS, a/k/a Greg, a/k/a Corporal George, Defendant - Appellant. No. 08-6027 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. THOMAS J. MACWILLIAMS, Greg, Corporal George, Defendant - Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (1:06-cr-00059-IMK-J
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6025 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. THOMAS J. MACWILLIAMS, a/k/a Greg, a/k/a Corporal George, Defendant - Appellant. No. 08-6027 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. THOMAS J. MACWILLIAMS, Greg, Corporal George, Defendant - Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (1:06-cr-00059-IMK-JSK-1; 1:06-cr-00059-01-IMK-JSK) Submitted: May 22, 2008 Decided: May 28, 2008 Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas J. MacWilliams, Appellant Pro Se. Shawn Angus Morgan, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Thomas J. MacWilliams appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to compel the release of evidence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. MacWilliams, Nos. 1:06-cr-00059-IMK-JSK-1; 1:06-cr-00059-01-IMK- JSK (N.D.W. Va. Nov. 15, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer