Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Williams v. Bays, 08-6118 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 08-6118 Visitors: 23
Filed: Apr. 24, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6118 KEVIN R. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MR. BAYS, Senior Psychologist; DAVID ROBINSON, Chief Warden; MR. HARVEY, Assistant Warden; DR. ASHAN, Psychiatrist; K. DAVID JONES, Psychologist, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:07-cv-00019-sgw-mfu) Submitted: April 17, 2008 Decided: April 24, 2008 Befo
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6118 KEVIN R. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MR. BAYS, Senior Psychologist; DAVID ROBINSON, Chief Warden; MR. HARVEY, Assistant Warden; DR. ASHAN, Psychiatrist; K. DAVID JONES, Psychologist, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:07-cv-00019-sgw-mfu) Submitted: April 17, 2008 Decided: April 24, 2008 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kevin R. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Rosalie Pemberton Fessier, TIMBERLAKE, SMITH, THOMAS & MOSES, PC, Staunton, Virginia; William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Kevin R. Williams appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Bays, No. 7:07-cv-00019-sgw-mfu (W.D. Va. May 23, 2007; Dec. 19, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer