Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Walton, 08-6188 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 08-6188 Visitors: 26
Filed: Apr. 30, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6188 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ERIC ARTHUR WALTON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (1:84-cr-00100-IMK-JES-1) Submitted: April 24, 2008 Decided: April 30, 2008 Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinio
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6188 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ERIC ARTHUR WALTON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (1:84-cr-00100-IMK-JES-1) Submitted: April 24, 2008 Decided: April 30, 2008 Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eric Arthur Walton, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Eric Arthur Walton appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying Walton’s motion filed pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 35 (applicable to offenses committed before November 1, 1987). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Walton, No. 1:84-cr-00100-IMK-JES-1 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 11, 2008). We deny Walton’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer