Filed: Aug. 08, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6542 MAURICE ROBINSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KIMBERLY S. TAYLOR, Superior Court Judge; MICHELLE WALKER, Assistant District Attorney; KAREN S. BIERNACKI, Assistant District Attorney, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:08-cv-00080-WO-RAE) Submitted: July 31, 2008 Decided: August 8, 2008 Before
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6542 MAURICE ROBINSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KIMBERLY S. TAYLOR, Superior Court Judge; MICHELLE WALKER, Assistant District Attorney; KAREN S. BIERNACKI, Assistant District Attorney, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:08-cv-00080-WO-RAE) Submitted: July 31, 2008 Decided: August 8, 2008 Before ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6542 MAURICE ROBINSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KIMBERLY S. TAYLOR, Superior Court Judge; MICHELLE WALKER, Assistant District Attorney; KAREN S. BIERNACKI, Assistant District Attorney, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:08-cv-00080-WO-RAE) Submitted: July 31, 2008 Decided: August 8, 2008 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Maurice Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Maurice Robinson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Robinson v. Taylor, No. 1:08-cv-00080-WO-RAE (M.D.N.C. Mar. 28, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
