Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Chase, 08-8063 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 08-8063 Visitors: 39
Filed: Dec. 18, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-8063 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. CLYNTON JOHN CHASE, Defendant – Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:91-cr-00086-GCM-2) Submitted: December 11, 2008 Decided: December 18, 2008 Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Claire J. R
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-8063 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. CLYNTON JOHN CHASE, Defendant – Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:91-cr-00086-GCM-2) Submitted: December 11, 2008 Decided: December 18, 2008 Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Claire J. Rauscher, Federal Public Defender, Tanzania Chevon Cannon-Eckerle, FEDERAL DEFENDERS OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA, INC., Steven George Slawinski, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Adam Christopher Morris, C. Nicks Williams, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Michael E. Savage, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Clynton John Chase appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Chase No. 3:91-cr-00086-GCM-2 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 18, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer