Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Brown v. American Institute for Research, 08-1265 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 08-1265 Visitors: 10
Filed: Mar. 03, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1265 JULLIAN L. BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. AMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH IN THE BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee, and AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:06-cv-02935-RWT) Submitted: January 29, 2009 Decided: March 3, 2009 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Cir
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1265 JULLIAN L. BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. AMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH IN THE BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee, and AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:06-cv-02935-RWT) Submitted: January 29, 2009 Decided: March 3, 2009 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerome E. Clair, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Natalie O. Ludaway, Matthew H. Goodman, LEFTWICH & LUDAWAY, LLC, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jullian L. Brown appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment in favor of the American Institutes for Research in the Behavioral Sciences, Inc., and denying her motion for reconsideration pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Am. Inst. for Research in the Behavioral Sciences, Inc., No. 8:06-cv-02935-RWT (D. Md. Oct. 1, 2007 & Jan. 28, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer