Filed: Oct. 21, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1526 LILLIE M. MIDDLEBROOKS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DONALD C. WINTER, Secretary, United States Department of Navy, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. William Connelly, Magistrate Judge. (8:05-cv-03209-WGC) Submitted: October 2, 2009 Decided: October 21, 2009 Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opin
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1526 LILLIE M. MIDDLEBROOKS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DONALD C. WINTER, Secretary, United States Department of Navy, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. William Connelly, Magistrate Judge. (8:05-cv-03209-WGC) Submitted: October 2, 2009 Decided: October 21, 2009 Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opini..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1526
LILLIE M. MIDDLEBROOKS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DONALD C. WINTER, Secretary, United States Department of
Navy,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. William Connelly, Magistrate Judge.
(8:05-cv-03209-WGC)
Submitted: October 2, 2009 Decided: October 21, 2009
Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lillie M. Middlebrooks, Appellant Pro Se. Larry David Adams,
Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lillie M. Middlebrooks appeals the magistrate judge’s ∗
orders granting counsel’s motion to withdraw and granting
summary judgment in favor of Middlebrooks’ former employer in
this employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Middlebrooks v.
Winter, No. 8:05-cv-03209-WGC (D. Md. Feb. 8, 2007; Mar. 19,
2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
∗
The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the
magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006).
2