Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Carter v. Alexander, 08-1620 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 08-1620 Visitors: 12
Filed: Oct. 15, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1620 MARSHA P. CARTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LT. GEN. KEITH B. ALEXANDER, Director, National Security Agency, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:07-cv-01772-WDQ) Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 15, 2009 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per cu
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1620 MARSHA P. CARTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LT. GEN. KEITH B. ALEXANDER, Director, National Security Agency, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:07-cv-01772-WDQ) Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 15, 2009 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marsha P. Carter, Appellant Pro Se. Alex Gordon, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Marsha P. Carter appeals the district court’s order dismissing her employment discrimination action. Carter has failed to challenge the district court’s dismissal of her retaliation claim and, therefore, she has forfeited appellate review of that claim. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). In addition, with respect to Carter’s claim of disparate treatment, we conclude that Carter failed to establish a prima facie case of discrimination. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately addressed in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer