Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Randolph v. New Hanover County Registrar, 08-1676 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 08-1676 Visitors: 35
Filed: May 14, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1676 SANDRA B. RANDOLPH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NEW HANOVER COUNTY REGISTRAR OF DEEDS REBECCA TUCKER SMITH, in her individual capacity, and in her capacity as New Hanover County Registrar of Deeds, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (4:06-cv-00233-FL) Submitted: April 21, 2009 Decided: May 14
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1676 SANDRA B. RANDOLPH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NEW HANOVER COUNTY REGISTRAR OF DEEDS REBECCA TUCKER SMITH, in her individual capacity, and in her capacity as New Hanover County Registrar of Deeds, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (4:06-cv-00233-FL) Submitted: April 21, 2009 Decided: May 14, 2009 Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Angela Gray, GRAY NEWELL, LLP, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. James R. Morgan, Jr., Mary Craven Adams, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Sandra B. Randolph appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment for Defendant on Randolph’s claims of racial discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Randolph v. New Hanover County Registrar of Deeds, No. 4:06-cv-00233-FL (E.D.N.C. May 6, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer