Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Patterson v. City of Chesapeake, 08-1796 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 08-1796 Visitors: 15
Filed: Feb. 23, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1796 ERWIN B. PATTERSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITY OF CHESAPEAKE; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; STEPHEN E. MILLS; JOHN C. LUMPKIN P.C.; TEIDE ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED; TOWNE BANK; CITY OF NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT; CITY OF CHESAPEAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT; WILLIAM T. HODSDEN; W.A. COPELAND; STUART GORDON; CITY OF NORFOLK; CLARENDON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants - Appellees. No. 08-1928 ERWIN B. PATTERSON, JR., P
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1796 ERWIN B. PATTERSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITY OF CHESAPEAKE; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; STEPHEN E. MILLS; JOHN C. LUMPKIN P.C.; TEIDE ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED; TOWNE BANK; CITY OF NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT; CITY OF CHESAPEAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT; WILLIAM T. HODSDEN; W.A. COPELAND; STUART GORDON; CITY OF NORFOLK; CLARENDON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants - Appellees. No. 08-1928 ERWIN B. PATTERSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITY OF CHESAPEAKE; STEPHEN E. MILLS; JOHN C. LUMPKIN P.C.; TEIDE ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED; CITY OF CHESAPEAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT; STUART GORDON; CLARENDON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants – Appellees, and COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; TOWNE BANK; CITY OF NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT; WILLIAM T. HODSDEN; W.A. COPELAND; CITY OF NORFOLK, Defendants. No. 08-2268 ERWIN B. PATTERSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOHN C. LUMPKIN P.C., Defendant – Appellee, and CITY OF CHESAPEAKE; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; STEPHEN E. MILLS; TEIDE ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED; TOWNE BANK; CITY OF NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT; CITY OF CHESAPEAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT; WILLIAM T. HODSDEN; W.A. COPELAND; STUART GORDON; CITY OF NORFOLK; CLARENDON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:07-cv-00611-RAJ-FBS) Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 23, 2009 Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 2 Erwin B. Patterson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Catherine Hanson Lindley, Grady A. Palmer, CHESAPEAKE CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Chesapeake, Virginia, Stephen Michael Hall, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, Marshall Allen Winslow, Jr., WOLCOTT, RIVERS & GATES, Virginia Beach, Virginia, Sara Ashley John, M. RICHARD EPPS, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, Robert Henry Burger, WILLIAMS MULLEN, Virginia Beach, Virginia, Andrew Richard Fox, Assistant City Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, Joseph Franklin Verser, JONES, BLECHMAN, WOLTZ & KELLY, PC, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 3 PER CURIAM: In these consolidated cases, Erwin B. Patterson, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s orders cumulatively dismissing all defendants from this civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Patterson v. City of Chesapeake, No. 2:07-cv-00611-RAJ-FBS (E.D. Va. June 20, 2008; Aug. 8, 2008; filed Sept. 30 & entered Oct. 2, 2008). We further grant Patterson’s motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, but deny his motion to admit new evidence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 4
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer