Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Taccino v. Litton Loan Servicing, 08-1997 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 08-1997 Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 16, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1997 WILLIAM A. TACCINO; MARLENE M. TACCINO, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. LITTON LOAN SERVICING; DENISE BAILEY, Assistant Secretary, Litton Loan for Note Holder LaSalle National Bank Association; ALVIN FRIEDMAN, Atty/Trst; KENNETH J. MACFAYDEN, Atty/Trst; LASALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; LARRY D. RICHMAN; HOWARD N. BIERMAN; JACOB GEESING; CARRIE M. WARD, Defendants – Appellees, and MICHAEL SCOTT COHEN; JAMES C. EBERLY, JR.
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1997 WILLIAM A. TACCINO; MARLENE M. TACCINO, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. LITTON LOAN SERVICING; DENISE BAILEY, Assistant Secretary, Litton Loan for Note Holder LaSalle National Bank Association; ALVIN FRIEDMAN, Atty/Trst; KENNETH J. MACFAYDEN, Atty/Trst; LASALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; LARRY D. RICHMAN; HOWARD N. BIERMAN; JACOB GEESING; CARRIE M. WARD, Defendants – Appellees, and MICHAEL SCOTT COHEN; JAMES C. EBERLY, JR., Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:08-cv-00348-WDQ) Submitted: March 30, 2009 Decided: April 16, 2009 Before GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William A. Taccino, Marlene M. Taccino, Appellants Pro Se. Michael Thomas Cantrell, FRIEDMAN & MACFADYEN, PC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: William A. Taccino and Marlene M. Taccino appeal the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss this civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Taccino v. Litton Loan Servicing, No. 1:08-cv-00348-WDQ (D. Md. Aug. 12, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer