Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Schlamp v. Prince George's County, Maryland, 08-2147 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 08-2147 Visitors: 23
Filed: Apr. 20, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-2147 JOHN RYAN SCHLAMP, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND; ISMAEL CANALES, Detective #1891, Prince George's County Police Department, Defendants – Appellees, and GLENN F. IVEY, Prince George's County States Attorney's Office; FRANCIS LONGWELL, Prince George's County States Attorney's Office; ELAINE MOORE, Captain, Prince George's County Police Department; BUTLER, Corporal #1891, Prince George's Coun
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-2147 JOHN RYAN SCHLAMP, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND; ISMAEL CANALES, Detective #1891, Prince George's County Police Department, Defendants – Appellees, and GLENN F. IVEY, Prince George's County States Attorney's Office; FRANCIS LONGWELL, Prince George's County States Attorney's Office; ELAINE MOORE, Captain, Prince George's County Police Department; BUTLER, Corporal #1891, Prince George's County Police Department; MELVIN C. HIGH, Chief of Police, Prince George's County Police Department; STEPHEN C. ORENSTEIN, Legal Advisor, Prince George's County Police Department; RONALD SCHIFF, Judge, Prince George's County Courts; ROSS BOGASH, PFC, University of Maryland Police; MARY BROCK, Corp., University of Maryland Police Department, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (1:06-cv-01644-DKC) Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 20, 2009 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Ryan Schlamp, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Bock Karpinski, KARPINSKI, COLARESI & KARP, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: John Ryan Schlamp appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Schlamp's motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Schlamp v. Prince George's County, Maryland, No. 1:06-cv-01644- DKC (D. Md. Sept. 11, 2008). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * We decline to consider issues Schlamp raises for the first time on appeal. 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer