Filed: Jul. 02, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-2291 DORIS N. ANDERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (3:06-cv-00399-MR-DCK) Submitted: June 23, 2009 Decided: July 2, 2009 Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Doris N. Anderson, Appellant
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-2291 DORIS N. ANDERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (3:06-cv-00399-MR-DCK) Submitted: June 23, 2009 Decided: July 2, 2009 Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Doris N. Anderson, Appellant ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-2291 DORIS N. ANDERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (3:06-cv-00399-MR-DCK) Submitted: June 23, 2009 Decided: July 2, 2009 Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Doris N. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. John James Doyle, Jr., CONSTANGY, BROOKS & SMITH, LLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Doris N. Anderson appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendant in her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Anderson v. Duke Energy Corp., No. 3:06-cv-00399-MR-DCK (W.D.N.C. Oct. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
