Filed: Jul. 15, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-4313 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. BRANDON JAMES PEGUESE, a/k/a Geese, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:07-cr-00017-GRA-4) Submitted: June 23, 2009 Decided: July 15, 2009 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curia
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-4313 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. BRANDON JAMES PEGUESE, a/k/a Geese, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:07-cr-00017-GRA-4) Submitted: June 23, 2009 Decided: July 15, 2009 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-4313
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
BRANDON JAMES PEGUESE, a/k/a Geese,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (6:07-cr-00017-GRA-4)
Submitted: June 23, 2009 Decided: July 15, 2009
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit
Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
D. Craig Brown, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellant. Alan
Lance Crick, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Brandon James Peguese seeks to appeal his conviction,
pursuant to a guilty plea, on one count of conspiracy to possess
with intent to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine and
the resulting sentence of 121 months. The district court
entered judgment on November 2, 2007. Peguese filed the notice
of appeal, dated December 10, 2007, on March 10, 2008. Because
Peguese failed to file a timely notice of appeal1 and it was
unclear whether Peguese delivered his notice to prison
authorities during the thirty-day excusable neglect period, we
remanded the case to the district court for a determination as
to whether the notice was given to prison officials during the
excusable neglect period, and if so, whether Peguese had shown
excusable neglect or good cause warranting an extension of the
time to file a notice of appeal.
Despite an order from the district court directing
Peguese to submit a response with the requested information,
Peguese failed to respond. The court therefore determined that
1
In criminal cases, the defendant must file the notice of
appeal within ten days after the entry of judgment. Fed. R.
App. P. 4(b)(1)(A). With or without a motion, upon a showing of
excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an
extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of appeal. Fed.
R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes,
759 F.2d 351, 353
(4th Cir. 1985).
2
Peguese filed his notice on December 10, 2007,2 but failed to
demonstrate excusable neglect or good cause. See United
States v. Peguese, No. 6:07-cr-00017-GRA-4 (D.S.C. Mar. 6,
2009). The matter is now before this court for final
disposition. In light of Peguese’s failure to file a timely
notice of appeal and the district court’s reasonable
determination that Peguese failed to demonstrate excusable
neglect or good cause for his late appeal, we dismiss the appeal
as untimely.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2
See Houston v. Lack,
487 U.S. 266 (1988).
3