Filed: Feb. 23, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6917 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. MELVIN WHITE, JR., a/k/a G, Defendant – Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:05-cr-00016-JPB-DJJ-1) Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 23, 2009 Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opi
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6917 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. MELVIN WHITE, JR., a/k/a G, Defendant – Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:05-cr-00016-JPB-DJJ-1) Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 23, 2009 Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opin..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6917
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
MELVIN WHITE, JR., a/k/a G,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey,
Chief District Judge. (3:05-cr-00016-JPB-DJJ-1)
Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 23, 2009
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brian Joseph Kornbrath, Federal Public Defender, Clarksburg,
West Virginia, Brian Christopher Crockett, Assistant Federal
Public Defender, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellant.
Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney,
Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Melvin White, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
granting in part and denying in part his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
(2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. United States v. Dunphy,
551 F.3d 247 (4th
Cir. 2009). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. United States v. White, No. 3:05-cr-00016-
JPB-DJJ-1 (N.D.W. Va. May 29, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2