Filed: May 26, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-7113 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TYRONE SMITH, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:01-cr-00092-jct-1) Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: May 26, 2009 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tyrone Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barr
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-7113 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TYRONE SMITH, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:01-cr-00092-jct-1) Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: May 26, 2009 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tyrone Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barre..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7113
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TYRONE SMITH,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior
District Judge. (7:01-cr-00092-jct-1)
Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: May 26, 2009
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tyrone Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson, Assistant
United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, Craig Jon
Jacobsen, I, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Tyrone Smith appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v.
Smith, No. 7:01-cr-00092-jct-1 (W.D. Va. June 24, 2008). See
United States v. Hood,
556 F.3d 226 (4th Cir. 2009). We deny
Smith’s motion to consolidate and appoint counsel. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2