Filed: Apr. 22, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-7686 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DARRELL DORIAN MIGGINS, a/k/a Darrell Miggins, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (3:00-cr-00014-nkm-2) Submitted: March 23, 2009 Decided: April 22, 2009 Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. D
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-7686 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DARRELL DORIAN MIGGINS, a/k/a Darrell Miggins, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (3:00-cr-00014-nkm-2) Submitted: March 23, 2009 Decided: April 22, 2009 Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Da..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-7686 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DARRELL DORIAN MIGGINS, a/k/a Darrell Miggins, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (3:00-cr-00014-nkm-2) Submitted: March 23, 2009 Decided: April 22, 2009 Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Darrell Dorian Miggins, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Mitchell Huber, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Darrell Dorian Miggins appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Miggins, No. 3:00-cr-00014-nkm-2 (W.D. Va. Aug. 4, 2008). We deny Miggins’ motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
