Filed: Apr. 28, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-7998 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. STACY TREMAINE JOHNSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (7:00-cr-00114-F-1; 7:03-cv-00194-F) Submitted: March 31, 2009 Decided: April 28, 2009 Before MICHAEL, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sta
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-7998 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. STACY TREMAINE JOHNSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (7:00-cr-00114-F-1; 7:03-cv-00194-F) Submitted: March 31, 2009 Decided: April 28, 2009 Before MICHAEL, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stac..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7998
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
STACY TREMAINE JOHNSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (7:00-cr-00114-F-1; 7:03-cv-00194-F)
Submitted: March 31, 2009 Decided: April 28, 2009
Before MICHAEL, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stacy Tremaine Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Gordon James,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Stacy Tremaine Johnson seeks to appeal the district
court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West
Supp. 2008) motion and denying his motions for reconsideration
and for a certificate of appealability. The orders are not
appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a
certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A
certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a
substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this
standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find
that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district
court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural
ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El
v. Cockrell,
537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel,
529
U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee,
252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th
Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and
conclude that Johnson has not made the requisite showing.
Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss
the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2