Filed: Mar. 09, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-8022 WARREN CHASE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WARDEN, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:08-cv-01702-CCB) Submitted: February 25, 2009 Decided: March 9, 2009 Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Warren Chase, Appellant Pro Se. Unp
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-8022 WARREN CHASE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WARDEN, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:08-cv-01702-CCB) Submitted: February 25, 2009 Decided: March 9, 2009 Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Warren Chase, Appellant Pro Se. Unpu..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-8022 WARREN CHASE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WARDEN, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:08-cv-01702-CCB) Submitted: February 25, 2009 Decided: March 9, 2009 Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Warren Chase, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Warren Chase, a Maryland inmate, appeals a district court order dismissing without prejudice his “emergency” pleading for failing to provide a more detailed supplement. We have reviewed the record and the district court order and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See Chase v. Warden, No. 1:08-cv-01702-CCB (D. Md. July 29, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
