Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

West v. Fuseyamore, 08-8443 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 08-8443 Visitors: 46
Filed: Jun. 04, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-8443 RONALD BLUE WEST, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MICHELLE T. FUSEYAMORE; REGIONAL COUNSEL; LIEUTENANT COUNSEL; FCI BUTNER; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:07-ct-03122-BO) Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 4, 2009 Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-8443 RONALD BLUE WEST, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MICHELLE T. FUSEYAMORE; REGIONAL COUNSEL; LIEUTENANT COUNSEL; FCI BUTNER; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:07-ct-03122-BO) Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 4, 2009 Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald Blue West, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina; Christina Ann Thompson, Attorney Advisor, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ronald Blue West appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680 (2006), and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. West v. Fuseyamore, No. 5:07-ct-03122-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 30, 2008). West’s motion to waive the filing fee is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer