Filed: Jun. 05, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1034 In Re: ALAN BEAVER LAVERTE WAY, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (8:02-cr-00210-DKC-1) Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 5, 2009 Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alan Beaver Laverte Way, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Alan Beaver Laverte Way petitions for a writ of man
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1034 In Re: ALAN BEAVER LAVERTE WAY, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (8:02-cr-00210-DKC-1) Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 5, 2009 Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alan Beaver Laverte Way, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Alan Beaver Laverte Way petitions for a writ of mand..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1034
In Re: ALAN BEAVER LAVERTE WAY,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (8:02-cr-00210-DKC-1)
Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 5, 2009
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alan Beaver Laverte Way, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Alan Beaver Laverte Way petitions for a writ of
mandamus seeking an order to compel the district court to
dismiss his indictment. We conclude that Way is not entitled to
mandamus relief.
Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner
has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. &
Loan Ass’n,
860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Further,
mandamus is a drastic remedy and should only be used in
extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court,
426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); In re Beard,
811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th
Cir. 1987).
The relief sought by Way is not available by way of
mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in
forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2